• LSQ Newsletter
  • Posts
  • Understanding (Connecting the Dots Without Losing Your Mind)

Understanding (Connecting the Dots Without Losing Your Mind)

Phase 2 of the LSQ Framework: Connecting the dots and building mental models that stick.

In partnership with

Build real AI and tech skills, faster

Udacity helps you build the AI and tech skills employers actually need—fast. Learn from industry experts through hands-on projects designed to mirror real-world work, not just theory.

Whether you’re advancing in your current role or preparing for what’s next, Udacity’s flexible, fully online courses let you learn on your schedule and apply new skills immediately. From AI and machine learning to data, programming, and cloud technologies, you’ll gain practical experience you can show, not just list on a résumé.

Build confidence, stay competitive, and move your career forward with AI and tech skills that are in demand.

Hi, this is Ray.

I have a confession to make: I once "learned" how to build a basic website by copying and pasting code from a forum. On the surface, I looked like a digital wizard. My site had buttons! It had colors! It had a cursor that turned into a tiny lightsaber! But the moment a single line of code broke, I was utterly helpless. I had the facts (the code), but I had zero understanding of the logic. I was a "cargo cult" programmer… performing the rituals without knowing why the gods of HTML weren't answering my prayers.

This is the trap of Phase 2. Most people move from Acquisition (gathering facts) straight to Retention (trying to memorize them) and skip the most vital part: Understanding.

If Acquisition is gathering the LEGO bricks, Understanding is realizing that the bricks have studs on top and holes on the bottom for a reason. Without this phase, your knowledge is just a pile of plastic that hurts when you step on it. Today, we’re going to talk about how to build "Mental Models" that turn raw data into actual wisdom.

The Illusion of Explanatory Depth

We all think we understand things better than we actually do. This is a cognitive bias known as the Illusion of Explanatory Depth.

There’s a famous study where researchers asked people if they understood how a zipper works. Most people said "Yes, obviously." Then, they were asked to write down a step-by-step technical explanation of the mechanism. Most people failed miserably. According to a study in Cognitive Science, we mistake our familiarity with an object for a deep understanding of its functional mechanics.

In your learning journey, this is the "Danger Zone." If you can't explain the mechanism of what you’re learning, you don't understand it; you’ve just memorized the label.

Strategy 1: The Feynman Technique (The "Explain it to a Five-Year-Old" Rule)

Named after the Nobel Prize-winning physicist Richard Feynman (who was basically the GOAT of explaining complex stuff), this technique is the ultimate "BS detector" for your own brain.

The process is simple:

  1. Write the name of the concept at the top of a blank sheet of paper.

  2. Explain it in plain English, as if you were teaching it to someone who has zero background in the subject.

  3. When you get stuck or start using "jargon" to hide your confusion, stop. That’s your gap.

  4. Go back to your source material (Phase 1) to fill that specific gap.

The goal isn't just to simplify; it’s to strip away the fluff until only the core logic remains. Research on the Learning-by-Teaching effect suggests that preparing to teach others significantly enhances the teacher's own conceptual understanding and organization of the material. If you can’t explain it simply, you haven’t "leveled up" your understanding yet.

Strategy 2: Analogical Mapping (The "It’s Like..." Method)

My brain basically runs on analogies. If you tell me how a CPU works, I’m going to imagine a tiny, very stressed-out office worker sorting mail. This isn't just me being a geek; it’s a powerful cognitive tool called Analogical Transfer.

Understanding happens when you anchor a new, "alien" concept to something you already know.

  • Electricity is like water flowing through pipes (Voltage = Pressure, Current = Flow).

  • The Internet is like a global postal system with billions of tiny envelopes.

  • A Cell is like a tiny factory with a boss (the Nucleus) and a power plant (the Mitochondria).

When you create an analogy, you are performing "Relational Mapping." A study published in Psychological Bulletin demonstrates that using analogies helps learners grasp the "deep structure" of a problem rather than getting bogged down in surface-level details.

Strategy 3: Concept Mapping (Visualizing the Web)

Understanding is non-linear. Textbooks are forced to be linear (Page 1, then Page 2), but your brain is a web. To bridge the gap, you need to see how ideas intersect.

This is where Concept Mapping comes in. Unlike a standard outline (which is just a list), a concept map uses "linking words" to define the relationship between ideas.

  • "Gravity" causes "Planetary Orbits."

  • "Photosynthesis" requires "Chlorophyll."

By physically drawing these connections, you are forcing your brain to identify the hierarchy of information. Meta-analyses have shown that concept mapping is more effective than reading textbooks, attending lectures, or participating in class discussions because it requires active, "generative" processing.

Why "Knowing" Isn't Enough

I used to be a trivia king. I knew the name of every actor who ever played a background Stormtrooper. But that’s "Inert Knowledge"… info that sits in your head but can't be used to solve real-world problems.

True understanding is functional. It’s the difference between knowing that a hammer is made of steel and knowing why you shouldn't use a glass hammer to build a house. When you understand the "Why" and the "How," the "What" becomes much easier to remember. In fact, when you have a strong mental model, you don't even have to "try" to memorize facts… they just naturally click into place because they have a home to go to.

Your "Understanding" Workout

Next time you’re tackling a tough topic, don't move on until you can do these three things:

  1. Summarize it in 2 sentences without using any technical terms.

  2. Create an analogy: "This concept is like [X] because [Y]."

  3. Find the "Why": Explain what would happen if this concept didn't exist or if one part of the system failed.

Final Thought

Understanding is hard. It’s supposed to be. It’s the "buffering" period where your brain is rewiring itself to accommodate a new reality. Don't rush it. I’d rather you understand three core concepts deeply than "memorize" a hundred facts that will evaporate the moment you close your laptop.

As for me, I’m still trying to "understand" why my cat insists on screaming at a blank wall at 3:00 AM. I have the facts (he screams, the wall is blank), but the mental model remains elusive. I’ll keep you posted.

Stay curious and keep asking "Why?" until it gets annoying.

Ray