Hi, this is Ray.

I want to tell you about a year of my life I now think of as the "great solo learner experiment." This was around 2008, I was trying to teach myself web development, and I had decided (for reasons that made sense to me at the time but now seem deeply suspicious) that I was going to do it ENTIRELY on my own. No courses. No teachers. No mentors. No bothering anyone with questions. Just me, the internet, and my unyielding willpower. I would emerge twelve months later, I imagined, as a fully formed self-taught developer with stories of independent grit to tell at parties.

What actually happened: I spent enormous amounts of time stuck on problems that any competent developer could have solved for me in five minutes. I made architectural decisions that I had to undo six months later because I didn't know they were bad decisions when I made them. I learned outdated practices from old tutorials and didn't realize they were outdated until much later. I plateaued at a level of competence that, looking back, was significantly below what I could have reached in the same time with even occasional guidance.

When I finally (reluctantly, ego in tow) joined a small developer community and started talking to people who knew more than me, my progress speed roughly tripled overnight. Not because I started working harder. Because I stopped working in the dark. Someone could just TELL me when I was about to make a stupid mistake. Someone could point me at the right resource instead of the 47 wrong ones. Someone could correct my misunderstandings before they ossified into permanent confusion. The entire dynamic changed once I let other humans into my learning process.

Today's newsletter is the case for not learning alone, plus the practical playbook for finding people to learn from… even when you don't have access to traditional mentors, can't afford a coach, and don't know where to start. Because the research on this is genuinely strong, and the modern world has actually made it MUCH easier than ever to find people to learn from. Most of us just don't take advantage of the options.

Let's start with the data. There's a substantial body of research on mentorship and learning outcomes, and it's encouraging.

A meta-analysis of 73 independent evaluations of youth mentoring programs found consistent benefits across multiple domains. According to the researchers, findings supported the effectiveness of mentoring for improving outcomes in multiple domains of youth functioning, including academic achievement test scores, with overall effect sizes around 0.21, and effectiveness varied considerably across different programs. An effect size of 0.21 isn't huge, but it's real, and it's consistent. Some specific programs produced much larger effects, particularly when the relationship between mentor and learner was strong and sustained.

The teacher-student relationship research tells a similar story at a broader scale. As one summary of the literature put it, research consistently highlights the positive correlation between strong teacher-student relationships and academic success, when students feel a personal connection with their teachers, they engage more actively, attend classes more regularly, complete assignments on time, and participate more in classroom discussions. This isn't just about having a teacher; it's about having a CONNECTION with one. The relationship itself is part of the learning mechanism, not just the delivery system for content.

The most striking finding for me, though, came from research on STEM mentorship. According to a National Academies report on effective mentorship, an empirical test with biology undergraduates found that mentees' perceptions of their mentors' effectiveness strongly shaped their beliefs in their own research skills and career knowledge, and predicted their research self-efficacy beliefs, which in turn predicted their enrollment in PhD or graduate medical programs. Translation: a good mentor doesn't just teach you the material. They change what you believe you're capable of, which changes what you actually attempt, which changes what you become. The mentor is downstream of the entire trajectory of the learner. That's a much bigger leverage point than just "person who answers questions about content."

So mentorship works. The question is how to actually find one (or several) when you're an adult learner without access to formal academic mentorship structures.

Most collagen supplements deliver on one promise. Carrara delivers on five.

Pique's Carrara Marine Collagen combines Type I marine collagen for visible skin radiance with rare Type II collagen from wild Hokkaido salmon, a first-of-its-kind pairing that supports both surface glow and deeper structural resilience. Add biotin for stronger hair and nails, micronized pearl powder for luminosity, and a rich coconut cream base that makes your daily ritual feel indulgent rather than obligatory.

This isn't a supplement you tolerate. It's one you look forward to. Stir it into your morning coffee or matcha and it works from the inside out to build the foundation beauty products can't reach.

Designed for superior absorption, results come faster than traditional collagen. Not a quick fix. A long-term investment in how you look and feel. 🧜‍♀️✨

Get 15% off for life

Before we get into the playbook, let me kill a misconception that I think keeps a lot of people from finding teachers. The cultural image of "a mentor" is some wise, gray-haired master taking you under their wing for a multi-year relationship of profound personal investment. This is one model of mentorship. It's also vanishingly rare in the actual world, especially for adult learners outside of formal academic programs. If you're holding out for this version, you'll wait forever.

The good news: research on mentorship has increasingly recognized that the mentor-learner relationship can take many forms, all of which provide real benefit. As one major review of mentorship in education noted, the most significant outcomes of mentorship include professional identity development, with mentorship working through multiple mechanisms including emotional support, knowledge transfer, and modeling of practice. The mechanisms can come from many different relationships, not just one wise sage.

Here's a more useful framework. You probably need different kinds of teachers for different aspects of your learning, and you can probably find them in different places. The categories that have helped me think about this:

The Master: Someone significantly further along than you in your specific field. They show you what's possible, model what good practice looks like, and can sometimes provide direct feedback. Hardest to find. Most prestigious. Don't wait for one before starting.

The Coach: Someone who teaches you specifically, whether paid or unpaid. A music teacher, a tutor, a writing coach, a programming instructor. Their job is your improvement. Often easier to find than masters because the relationship is transactional and clear.

The Peer-Plus: Someone roughly at your level or slightly ahead, who is happy to swap knowledge with you. Often the most accessible and underrated category. They've recently solved the problems you're currently working on. Their advice is specific, recent, and applicable.

The Crowd: A community of practitioners. No single mentor relationship, but constant exposure to people doing the thing, asking questions, answering questions, sharing work. Often the most realistic option for self-directed adult learners.

The Distant Teacher: Authors, podcast hosts, YouTube creators, course makers. People you learn from at a distance who never know you exist. The least personal, but the most accessible. Use them for foundational content, but don't mistake them for actual mentorship.

You probably need a mix of these. You don't need all of them, and you definitely don't need to find a Master before starting. Most of my learning over the past 15 years has come from peer-plus and crowd categories, with occasional coaches for specific skills. Masters are a wonderful bonus when they appear. Don't wait for them.

Okay, here's how to actually find people to learn from. Steal what's useful.

Before you can find a teacher, you need to know what you're looking for help with. "I want to get better at writing" is too vague. "I want to learn how to write longer-form personal essays that have a clear narrative arc" is specific enough that you can evaluate whether someone can help you.

The more specific your learning goal, the easier it becomes to identify who might teach you. People who help you with the specific thing exist. People who help with the vague version don't.

This is the highest-leverage move for most adult learners. Almost every learnable skill has at least one community where practitioners gather… online forums, Discord servers, Reddit subforums, Facebook groups, in-person meetups, conference circuits. Find these communities and join them. Lurk for a while to understand the norms. Then start participating.

The communities serve multiple functions at once: they're where you find masters (some of them are usually present), where you find coaches (often someone in the community offers paid teaching), where you find peer-plus relationships (most of the active members), and where you get crowd exposure to the practice. One community membership often unlocks all four mentor categories simultaneously.

The research on this is encouraging. Studies on professional learning communities have consistently found that learners embedded in active communities outperform isolated learners, even when their formal instruction is similar. The community provides a learning environment that individual relationships can't fully replicate. As the mentorship review noted, one of the most significant outcomes of mentorship is the formation and evolution of a learner's professional identity, which develops most strongly within communities of practice. You become a writer by being among writers. A coder by being among coders. A musician by being among musicians. The community shapes the identity, and the identity sustains the practice.

Here's an uncomfortable truth most "find a mentor" advice glosses over. People with skills and expertise get asked for help constantly. Their default answer is no, because if they said yes to everyone, they'd have no time for their own work. The question isn't "how do I get a mentor"… it's "how do I become someone an expert is willing to spend time on."

The research on effective mentor-learner relationships is clear that mentors invest most in learners who:

Become this person first. Then ask for help. The hit rate is dramatically higher.

When you do ask for help, don't ask for "mentorship" as an open-ended commitment. That's a huge ask, and most people will say no even if they like you, because they don't know what they're agreeing to. Instead, ask for specific, bounded things:

"Could I send you the draft of this essay and get 15 minutes of your feedback?"

"Could I take you to coffee and ask you three questions about how you got into X?"

"Would you be willing to look at this code I'm stuck on for 10 minutes?"

These are small enough asks that people often say yes. And here's the important part: a series of small "yeses" is how mentor relationships actually form. You don't ask someone to be your mentor. You ask them for one specific thing. You honor that ask by being prepared, respectful of their time, and grateful afterward. You report back on what you did with their advice. Then, eventually, you ask for another specific thing. Over time, if it goes well, you've quietly built a real relationship without ever using the word "mentor."

This is underrated advice. If you have any disposable income, paying for teaching is one of the highest-ROI uses of money for learners. Coaches, courses, group programs, paid mentorship… they all exist, and they often produce results that would be impossible through free-only channels.

Why? Because paid teaching aligns incentives. The teacher has explicitly committed to your improvement. They've structured their offering around producing results. They can devote real time to you because you're paying for that time. The constraint that limits free mentorship (that experts have only so much attention to give away) doesn't apply when their attention is being compensated.

Don't assume paid teaching is out of reach. There are coaches and tutors at every price point, from $20/hour grad students to $500/hour world experts. Many of them offer free initial sessions or sliding scale options. Even a few hours of paid teaching at the right inflection point can dramatically accelerate your progress. The investment usually pays back many times over in time saved and progress made.

Don't put all your mentorship eggs in one basket. The single-mentor model is fragile. People get busy, move away, change interests. If your entire learning trajectory depends on one relationship, you're vulnerable.

The healthy version: have several people you learn from in different ways. A coach for the specific skill. A peer for daily problem-solving. A community for ongoing exposure. A few authors and creators whose work you study. A friend who's slightly ahead of you. A friend who's slightly behind you (yes, teaching them is part of your learning… that's real). When one source goes quiet, the others keep you going.

A quick warning section, because mentorship can also go badly.

Avoid mentors who make the relationship about themselves. Healthy mentorship serves the learner. Some "mentors" are looking for an audience, an apprentice to feel important about, or someone to validate their own choices. The asymmetry is fine (they have more knowledge than you) but the focus should be on your development, not their ego.

Avoid mentors who give advice based on what worked for them 20 years ago without considering whether the world has changed. Industries shift. Skills that were valuable in 2005 may not be valuable now. Good mentors update their advice based on current reality. Bad ones repeat the same playbook from their own success era forever.

Avoid mentors who insist on a rigid path. The mentor's job is to help you become the version of you that's possible. Not to make you a copy of them. If a mentor's advice always points back to their own approach, regardless of whether it fits you, find another mentor.

Avoid mentor relationships with no actual content exchange. If you've been "being mentored" for six months and you can't point to anything specific you've learned, the relationship is decorative, not functional. Move on.

Here's what I want you to take from all this. Solo learning is a romantic ideal that produces consistently worse outcomes than guided learning. The myth of the autodidact who teaches themselves everything from scratch is mostly a myth… even the famous autodidacts you can name had teachers, mentors, communities, and feedback loops that they often downplayed in their personal narratives.

You don't need to be one of those people. The fully self-taught learning trajectory is rarely the best one available, and pursuing it is often a way of protecting your ego at the cost of your progress. There are real teachers in the world. There are real communities of practice. There are real coaches who would be delighted to help you for a reasonable fee. Use them. The shortest path between where you are and where you want to be almost always runs through someone who's been there before.

If you've been trying to learn something hard alone for a while and feeling stuck, I'd gently suggest the problem isn't your discipline. The problem is the absence of teachers. Find some. Even one will help. Several will transform what's possible.

Frodo had Gandalf, and even Gandalf had Saruman before things went sideways, and the Istari before him. Nobody learns alone. Stop pretending you have to.

Keep learning (and keep finding people to learn from),

Ray