Hi, this is Ray.

I want to tell you about a habit I almost killed in myself, in the name of being a better learner. There was a stretch of my late twenties when I decided that "reading for fun" was an indulgence I couldn't really afford anymore. I had so much I was trying to learn… business books, technical books, science books, productivity books. The novels and the literary nonfiction I'd loved as a teenager felt frivolous compared to the serious educational books I "should" be reading. So I quietly stopped reading fiction. I told myself I'd get back to it later, once I'd finished learning all the important stuff.

The result, after about three years of this regime: I had read approximately 70 self-improvement and business books, retained almost none of them in a meaningful way, and developed a quiet but persistent feeling that my brain was getting duller, not sharper. I couldn't quite name what was missing. I'd been doing what I thought I was supposed to do. Why didn't it feel like learning anymore?

I eventually picked up a novel again, almost by accident. A friend pressed a copy into my hands during a long weekend and I read it because I had nothing else to do. Halfway through, something shifted. I noticed I was thinking again… really thinking, the kind of thinking I'd associated with my best learning periods. Sentences were lighting up parts of my mind that the productivity books hadn't touched in years. I finished the novel and immediately started another. Within months, my reading habit had reorganized itself around what I now realize was actually a more cognitively productive pattern. The business books got mixed back in. But the fiction and the leisure reading returned to a central place, and the overall quality of my learning life improved noticeably.

It turns out this experience is genuinely common, and the research on leisure reading (reading for pleasure rather than for direct instrumental purposes) has been quietly building for decades into a strong case that I wish someone had made to me earlier. Today's newsletter is about that. Why reading for fun is one of the most underrated learning tools you have, what the research actually shows about its cognitive effects, and why the "productive" reading habit might be quietly making you a worse learner than the "fun" reading habit you're feeling guilty about. Let's get into it.

From our partners at Hubspot:

Picture this. A buyer opens ChatGPT and asks for a recommendation in your category. Your competitor's name comes up. Yours doesn't. And that buyer never makes it to your website.

That's happening right now in markets everywhere. And most teams don't know it's happening because it never shows up in their analytics.

HubSpot AEO shows you exactly where your brand stands in AI search, where competitors are getting recommended instead of you, and tells you specifically what to fix. No expertise needed.

Try it free for 28 days. Just $50 a month after.

Let me start with the data, because this turns out to be one of those areas where the research is much stronger than the cultural conversation suggests.

The biggest recent study came out of the University of Cambridge in 2023, using data from over 10,000 adolescents in the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development project. According to the researchers, there was a strong link between reading for pleasure at an early age and a positive performance in adolescence on cognitive tests that measured factors such as verbal learning, memory and speech development, and at school academic achievement… these children also had better mental wellbeing, fewer signs of stress and depression, improved attention, and fewer behavioural problems. The findings extended to brain structure. When the researchers looked at brain scans, the participants who had taken to reading for pleasure earlier in childhood showed moderately larger total brain areas and volumes in specific regions associated with cognitive function.

Worth pausing on. This isn't a correlation between "reads books" and "tests well." This is a study showing measurable brain structure differences correlated with how much someone read for fun in childhood. The brain itself develops differently when reading is part of a person's life. The optimal amount, according to the researchers, was around 12 hours per week of pleasure reading. Beyond that, additional benefits seemed to plateau.

A separate longitudinal study from University College London has been tracking the relationship between reading and cognition over even longer timescales. According to the researchers, those who had regularly read for pleasure at age 10 scored 67 per cent in a vocabulary test at age 42, whereas infrequent childhood readers scored only 51 per cent. Thirty-two years later. The pleasure reading at age 10 still showed up in vocabulary at age 42. Those are cognitive effects that compound across an entire adult life. Few interventions produce effects you can measure decades later. Pleasure reading apparently does.

What's striking about this body of research is that the benefits show up across pretty much every cognitive and academic measure researchers have tested. As one comprehensive review put it, studies demonstrate positive associations between children and young people's recreational reading and cognitive development, academic attainment, comprehension, general knowledge, and vocabulary, with reading for pleasure also linked to social and emotional well-being and most recently to brain size in adolescence. It's not just one cognitive function. It's a broad pattern of cognitive and developmental benefits, showing up across decades of research, across multiple methodologies, across many countries and contexts.

Here's the part that took me longest to internalize. The research doesn't just show that reading helps cognition. It shows that the LEISURE component matters. Reading you're forced to do, reading you're doing for explicit instrumental purposes, reading you don't actually enjoy… these don't reliably produce the same effects.

Why? A few mechanisms stack together.

Engagement depth. When you read something you genuinely enjoy, you read it differently than when you're slogging through something you've decided you "should" read. The engaged reading involves richer cognitive processing… you're imagining scenes more vividly, making more connections to your existing knowledge, building more elaborate mental models. The slogging reading involves surface-level processing that produces the feeling of having read without producing the cognitive benefits.

Sustained attention. Pleasure reading trains sustained attention in a way that fragmented "productive" reading often doesn't. A novel you can't put down has you focused for hours at a stretch… exactly the kind of sustained attention that the deep work and focus research consistently identifies as cognitively valuable. The self-help book you keep putting down because it's not actually engaging isn't training that attention muscle, regardless of how virtuous the content is.

Voluntary engagement. There's a substantial body of research on intrinsic versus extrinsic motivation that bears directly on reading. When you read because you want to, the cognitive systems engaged are different from when you read because you should. The intrinsically motivated reading produces deeper encoding, better retention, and broader transfer than the extrinsically motivated reading. Same words on the page. Different brain state processing them.

Vocabulary acquisition through context. This is the mechanism the research has been most clear about. Reading for pleasure tends to expose you to a much wider vocabulary than you'd encounter in conversation, professional contexts, or instructional reading. The exposure happens in rich semantic contexts that make the vocabulary stick. Decades of vocabulary research show that this contextual acquisition is dramatically more effective than rote vocabulary study. The novel you read for fun is teaching you words in ways that vocabulary apps can't match.

The bridge to harder reading. As one analysis noted, reading for pleasure provides a bridging function or 'conduit' to more challenging academic reading and sub-technical vocabulary. The pleasure reading builds the underlying reading capability that lets you handle more demanding material later. Skip the pleasure reading and you lose the bridge. The "serious" reading you intended to focus on becomes harder than it needs to be, because you haven't built the underlying capacity that pleasure reading develops.

Let me get concrete about what specifically improves when you read for pleasure, because "reading helps cognition" is too vague to act on.

Vocabulary. This is the most robustly documented benefit. People who read for pleasure regularly accumulate vocabularies that significantly exceed those of similarly-educated people who don't. The vocabulary differences show up in standardized tests, in writing quality, in the precision of thinking. Words are tools for thought. More words means more nuanced thinking.

Reading fluency itself. The more you read, the better your raw reading skills become. Faster comprehension. Better inference. More automatic processing. This compounds because better reading skills make all your other learning more efficient… every textbook, every article, every email is processed faster and more deeply when your reading capacity is higher.

Empathy and theory of mind. Fiction reading specifically has been linked to improved ability to model other people's mental states. The novel forces you to inhabit perspectives that aren't your own, which appears to train the cognitive systems that handle this in general life. This has implications well beyond literature… theory of mind affects negotiation, leadership, teaching, parenting, and most other relationally complex activities.

General knowledge. Pleasure reading exposes you to far more topics, contexts, time periods, and ideas than your formal education or work life would ever cover. The cumulative effect is a broader base of general knowledge that supports learning in almost any domain. New material lands on a richer prior knowledge base, which makes the new material easier to integrate.

Sustained attention. As covered above, pleasure reading is one of the few activities in modern life that involves voluntarily holding attention on one stream of input for extended periods. This trains the underlying attention capability that benefits every other cognitively demanding task.

Stress reduction. This isn't strictly a learning benefit, but it matters for learning. Reading has been shown to reduce stress more effectively than several common alternatives. Less stress means better learning conditions for everything else you're trying to do.

A nuance worth knowing about: not all pleasure reading appears to produce identical benefits. The research suggests some interesting patterns.

The UCL longitudinal study found that what people chose to read as adults mattered as much as how often they read… the greatest improvements between ages 16 and 42 were made by readers of 'highbrow' fiction. The literary fiction… novels with complex vocabulary, demanding sentence structures, and rich character interiority… appeared to produce stronger cognitive benefits than easier reading. This isn't snobbery. It's a pattern in the data. Harder, denser reading seems to train cognitive systems that easier reading doesn't quite reach.

That said, the research is also clear that ANY pleasure reading is dramatically better than no pleasure reading. The optimization question between literary fiction and lighter reading is secondary to the question of whether you're reading for pleasure at all. Start where you are. If you currently read nothing for fun, picking up genre fiction you enjoy will produce real benefits. Once the habit is established, you can experiment with denser material and see what happens.

Nonfiction reading produces some of the same benefits… particularly vocabulary, general knowledge, and sustained attention. But fiction has some specific cognitive effects that nonfiction doesn't quite replicate. The empathy and theory of mind benefits, in particular, seem to come more strongly from fiction than from nonfiction. A balanced reading diet probably involves both.

Okay, the practical part. If you've been neglecting pleasure reading and want to bring it back, here's what works.

Start with what you actually enjoy. The cognitive benefits depend on you actually reading the books. A book you'll finish in genre fiction is more valuable than a literary classic you'll abandon after 40 pages. Start where the reading is sustainable. You can elevate the difficulty over time once the habit is established.

Schedule it like other important things. "I'll read when I have time" produces no reading. "I read for 20 minutes before bed every night" produces a real habit. Pick a time. Defend it. The schedule does most of the work.

Replace some scrolling time, not study time. Don't sacrifice your other learning to fit in pleasure reading. Sacrifice the lower-value activities that are currently eating your hours. Most of us have plenty of phone time that could become reading time without giving up anything we actually need.

Always have a book within reach. Physical book on your nightstand, ebook on your phone, audiobook ready for commutes. The friction to start reading should be minimal. The lower the friction, the more reading actually happens.

Don't try to remember everything. Pleasure reading isn't studying. You're not taking notes. You're not building flashcards. You're just reading, with engagement, and trusting that the cognitive benefits accumulate without conscious tracking. Trying to over-study your pleasure reading kills both the pleasure and most of the benefit. Let it just be reading.

Quit books you're not enjoying. Life is short. Books are abundant. If you're 50 pages in and dreading the next session, put it down and pick up something else. The "I should finish what I started" mindset destroys pleasure reading habits faster than almost anything else. Reading is voluntary. Treat it that way.

Mix genres and types. If you only read one thing, you get less varied cognitive exposure. Some literary fiction. Some genre fiction. Some narrative nonfiction. Some essays. The variety keeps both the cognitive stimulation and the personal interest higher.

Track quantity, not "productivity." If you want to measure something, measure how many minutes you read or how many books you finish. Don't measure what you "got" from each book. The cumulative effect over years is what matters, not the explicit takeaways from any specific book.

Here's what I want you to take from all this. The cultural conversation about reading has been split into a weird false dichotomy. On one side, the "productive" readers who only read business books, self-improvement, and "useful" nonfiction, feeling vaguely superior to people who read fiction. On the other side, the people who read for fun, feeling vaguely guilty that they should be reading more "important" books. Both groups have it partly wrong.

The research suggests that pleasure reading… including fiction, including escapist genre stuff, including the books you've been feeling guilty about… is producing real cognitive benefits that the "productive" reading often doesn't match. Reading you enjoy enough to actually finish is more valuable than reading you slog through. Reading that's genuinely engaging trains your brain differently than reading that's instrumentally motivated. The pleasure isn't extra. The pleasure is part of how the cognitive benefits get produced.

If you've been neglecting pleasure reading because it didn't feel productive enough, please reconsider. The novel you've been thinking about reading is, in real measurable ways, also a learning activity. The fiction you loved as a teenager and abandoned as an adult was doing more cognitive work than you knew. Bring it back. Not as a guilty indulgence. As an actual part of your learning life.

The cheapest, most accessible, most well-evidenced cognitive enhancer in existence is sitting on your bookshelf right now or available at your library or a few clicks away. Most people have access to it. Most people don't use it. The ones who do are quietly accumulating cognitive advantages that compound across decades.

Even Gandalf read. He was thousands of years old and still reading. The wisest beings stay readers. Maybe that's part of how they got wise.

Keep learning (and keep reading for fun),

Ray