Hi, this is Ray.

I want to start with a specific realization I had a few years ago that changed how I think about my learning failures. I was reflecting on why certain learning projects had thrived while others had died despite similar external circumstances. On the surface, both categories had similar structures. Similar time investments planned. Similar resources available. Similar external motivations to pursue them. Yet some had flourished and others had collapsed, and I couldn't quite articulate why.

When I looked more honestly, the pattern that emerged was uncomfortable. The learning projects that had thrived were the ones connected to something I actually valued at a deep level. The ones that had died were connected to things I thought I should value but didn't actually value when I was honest with myself. The gap between what I thought I should care about and what I actually cared about had been silently determining which learning projects sustained themselves and which quietly withered.

This wasn't about lacking discipline. It was about a specific mismatch between my stated goals and my actual values. When those aligned, learning happened almost effortlessly. When they didn't align, no amount of technique or discipline compensated for the underlying disconnect. And I noticed something else: I could actually change my values over time through specific practices. This wasn't just a matter of discovering fixed values I had. It was possible to build values that supported the kinds of learning I wanted to pursue.

Today's newsletter is about that. What the research actually shows about the relationship between personal values and learning, why the values you hold shape which learning projects can actually sustain themselves, and how to actually build values that support the learning you want to develop. This is one of those foundational insights that's easy to underestimate but that shapes almost everything downstream about your learning life. Let's get into it.

Stax Payments, a Hubspot customer, now books 80% more meetings with the exact same team they had before.

No new hires. No new territories. Just HubSpot's Prospecting Agent finding the right accounts, surfacing the right contacts, and drafting outreach that actually gets responses.

Your best rep is great because they know who to go after and when. Prospecting Agent gives every rep that same starting point.

Get a demo

Let me start with what the science shows, because the evidence is more specific than most learners realize.

According to research on personal values and academic achievement, self-direction thought promoted grades through autonomous forms of academic motivation. Conformity rules promoted grades through better teachers' evaluations of students' classroom behaviour. Self-direction-action and conformity-interpersonal were unrelated to grades. Regarding the other values, hedonism and stimulation related negatively to grades. Read this carefully. Different values predict different outcomes. Self-direction values (valuing independent thought and autonomy) directly predict better academic performance through the specific mechanism of autonomous motivation. Meanwhile, values oriented toward immediate pleasure and stimulation actually negatively predict achievement. Same students. Same schools. Different values producing categorically different learning outcomes.

The mechanism is worth understanding. According to research on values and school engagement, self-transcendence values were linked to an increase in mastery approach goals, which were in turn positively related to school engagement. Additionally, although both self-improvement and self-transcendence values positively correlated with adolescents' school engagement, the correlation was stronger for self-improvement values. Read this. Self-improvement values (valuing becoming better at things) predict school engagement more strongly than other values. This isn't a marginal effect. It's a substantial predictor of who sustains engagement with learning versus who doesn't.

The research on learning approaches specifically connects values to depth of engagement. According to research on values and learning approaches, personal values such as achievement and power were related to the achieving approach, security and tradition values to the surface approach, and self-direction and universalism to the deep learning approach. Read this carefully. Different values produce different approaches to learning at a fundamental level. If you value achievement and power, you tend to focus on getting good grades and outperforming others… which produces a specific kind of learning outcome. If you value security and tradition, you tend to engage superficially with material to meet requirements. If you value self-direction and understanding, you tend to engage deeply with material for its own sake… which produces a different, more durable kind of learning.

The meta-analytic evidence on self-determined motivation ties this all together. According to a comprehensive analysis, students' self-determined motivation (acting out of interest, curiosity, and abiding values) is associated with higher academic well-being, persistence, and achievement. Self-determination theory posits that self-determined motivation is dependent on satisfying three basic psychological needs. Read this. Self-determined motivation (motivation that comes from your own values rather than external pressure) is what actually predicts persistent achievement in learning. And this motivation depends on your values being genuinely your own rather than imposed from outside.

Let me get specific about the mechanisms, because "values matter" is too vague to act on.

Values drive persistence through difficulty. All meaningful learning involves periods of genuine difficulty. When your learning is aligned with what you actually value, you have internal reasons to persist through the hard parts. When it isn't, you're relying on external motivation that often fails when the hard parts arrive.

Values determine what feels worth the effort. Every learning project competes with other things you could do with your time. Values shape which competitions the learning wins. If you value understanding deeply, spending time on complex material feels worth it. If you value social connection above understanding, spending the same time with friends will consistently win out. Your values are constantly making these tradeoffs, whether you're conscious of them or not.

Values shape what you attend to. According to research on values, you notice things aligned with your values more than things that aren't. If you value craftsmanship, you notice subtle details in what you're learning that people with different values would miss. This selective attention shapes what you actually absorb and retain.

Values connect learning to identity. As I've written before in this newsletter about identity-based motivation, learning that connects to who you're becoming sustains itself in ways learning disconnected from identity doesn't. Your values are the core of your identity. Learning aligned with your values reinforces your identity through the very act of pursuing it.

Values determine what integration feels meaningful. Complex learning requires integrating knowledge across domains. Whether these integrations feel meaningful or arbitrary depends on your values. What connects to what you care about feels significant. What doesn't just feels like miscellaneous facts. In Fullmetal Alchemist, Edward and Alphonse's alchemy studies matter to them not as abstract knowledge but as directly connected to their core values around family and restoration. This connection is what makes them willing to endure the specific difficulties their studies require.

Values shape long-term direction. Values operate across years and decades. Short-term goals come and go. Values persist. Your values determine what learning arcs are worth pursuing across the long time periods that mastery requires.

The research points at specific values that most strongly predict sustained engagement with learning. This doesn't mean these are the only "right" values… but they're the ones the evidence suggests support the kind of sustained learning most readers of this newsletter are trying to build.

Self-improvement. Valuing becoming better than you currently are. Not comparison to others… genuine growth relative to your past self. This value predicts sustained engagement with learning more strongly than most other values.

Self-direction. Valuing autonomous thought and independent action. This produces the autonomous motivation that sustains learning through periods when external motivation would fail.

Curiosity. Valuing understanding for its own sake, not just as means to other ends. This is what sustains engagement with complex material during the periods when practical rewards are absent.

Craftsmanship. Valuing quality and depth in what you produce. This drives the specific attention to detail that produces genuine capability rather than surface familiarity.

Wisdom. Valuing accumulated understanding across time. This supports the long-term commitment that mastery requires.

Contribution. Valuing being useful to others through your capabilities. This gives learning a meaning beyond personal benefit that sustains it through difficult periods.

Integrity. Valuing consistency between what you know and what you do. This produces the specific commitment to genuine understanding rather than performative knowledge.

Okay, the practical part. Values aren't fixed… they can be developed through specific practices. Here's how.

Clarify what you actually value. Before you can build values, you need to know what your actual current values are. Not what you think you should value. Not what you tell others you value. What actually drives your choices when you're being honest. This clarity is often uncomfortable because it reveals gaps between your stated and actual values. But it's the foundation for any real change.

Engage with people who embody the values you want to develop. Values are contagious. Spending time with people who genuinely embody curiosity, craftsmanship, wisdom, or whatever values you want to build shifts your own values through prolonged exposure. Choose your environment accordingly.

Consume content aligned with the values you want to build. Books, podcasts, essays, videos… the content you consume shapes your values through repeated exposure to specific framings. Consuming content that treats deep understanding as valuable makes you value deep understanding. Consuming content that treats status and comparison as important makes you value those things.

Make decisions that reinforce the values you want to develop. Values develop through the choices you make. When you consistently choose actions aligned with self-direction, you become more self-directed. When you consistently choose actions aligned with craftsmanship, you become more craftsman-like. The choices shape the values that then shape future choices… a positive feedback loop when values and actions align.

Practice noticing when your actions don't match your stated values. These mismatches are diagnostic. They reveal what you actually value versus what you think you should value. Rather than being ashamed of the mismatch, use it as information. If your actions consistently prioritize comfort over growth, you value comfort more than growth right now. This is honest data that lets you decide whether to adjust the values or accept them.

Reflect on why specific values matter to you. Values connected to real personal reasons persist better than values held for abstract "should" reasons. When you can articulate why craftsmanship matters to your specific life, that value has more traction than when you value it because someone told you it was important.

Give values time to develop. Values don't shift dramatically overnight. They develop over months and years through consistent exposure and choice. Don't expect immediate transformation. Do expect gradual shift when you consistently expose yourself to different environments, content, and choices.

Notice when your learning is fighting your values. If you're trying to learn something that has no connection to what you actually value, either build the connection deliberately or reconsider whether this learning is right for you now. In Mass Effect, Shepard's most sustained efforts align with his or her core values… the missions that don't align tend to feel obligatory even when strategically important. Same principle applies to your learning. Alignment with values sustains engagement. Fighting your values requires willpower that eventually depletes.

Some honest caveats.

Values aren't infinitely flexible. Some core values are fairly stable across your life. You can shape and refine them, but you probably can't turn yourself into a completely different person. Work with your genuine values rather than trying to impose completely foreign ones.

Building values isn't manipulation. This isn't about tricking yourself into caring about things you don't care about. It's about genuinely developing capacity to care about things that would serve you if you cared about them.

Some values conflict with each other. You can't maximize everything. Sometimes values you want both point in different directions. This requires making genuine choices about which values to prioritize when they conflict.

Cultural context matters. The values I've highlighted are somewhat culture-specific. Different cultures emphasize different values, and value orientations vary across societies. What I've written reflects patterns most visible in individualist Western research, but the general principle (that values shape learning) applies across cultures even when the specific valued content differs.

Individual variation is real. Different people have different natural value orientations. The specific mix that works for you may differ from what works for others. Pay attention to what actually produces sustained engagement in your specific life rather than assuming universal answers.

Here's what I want you to take from all this. The learning that sustains itself is the learning aligned with your actual values. This isn't a psychological trick or a motivational gimmick. It's a specific structural feature of how humans direct sustained effort over long time periods. Your values determine what feels worth the effort, what feels meaningful to understand, what feels important to complete. Learning that fights these underlying values requires ongoing willpower that eventually runs out. Learning that aligns with them sustains itself in ways that pure discipline never could.

If you've been struggling to sustain learning projects that seem like they should matter, please consider that the issue might not be your discipline. It might be that the projects don't actually connect to what you deeply value. Some of them might not be worth pursuing given who you actually are. Others might be worth pursuing but require you to build the connection between them and your existing values before you can sustain them.

The specific practical move I'd suggest: this week, examine your current learning projects honestly against your actual values. Which ones connect to what you genuinely care about? Which ones exist because you think you should care about them? Which values would need to develop for you to sustain the projects you want to sustain? Then work on either aligning your projects to your actual values, or deliberately developing values that would support the learning you want to pursue.

In Dark Souls, the players who make it through the entire game aren't the ones with the best reflexes or the most efficient techniques. They're the ones whose core relationship with the difficulty aligns with the game's specific challenges… those who value the specific kind of learning through struggle that the game demands. The players who don't value that kind of experience abandon the game long before reaching the end. Your learning works the same way. What you value determines what you can sustain. Build values that support the learning you want. Everything else follows from that alignment.

Keep learning (and keep building the values that sustain it),

Ray