This website uses cookies

Read our Privacy policy and Terms of use for more information.

In partnership with

Hi, this is Ray.

Quick confession about the most productive learning period of my adult life. It wasn't during a course I paid for. It wasn't during a certification I needed for work. It wasn't during any of the projects I'd carefully justified as career-relevant. It was during a stretch of about eight months in my late twenties when I got weirdly obsessed with medieval European history for absolutely no professional reason. I wasn't in school. I wasn't teaching it. I had no plans to write about it. I just found myself compulsively reading about the Hundred Years' War, watching documentaries about Byzantine emperors, listening to podcasts about the fall of Constantinople during my commute, and generally cramming my brain full of information that had zero utility for my actual life.

The strange thing is what happened to my general cognitive state during those eight months. My focus at work got better. My reading speed and comprehension across all domains improved noticeably. My memory for other kinds of information seemed sharper. My conversations became more interesting, at least to me. I was learning something for pure enjoyment, and the enjoyment was somehow making me a better learner across everything else. This didn't fit the productivity narrative I'd absorbed, which said that if learning wasn't directly serving an outcome, it was wasted time. My medieval history obsession was, by that logic, a giant waste of eight months. Except it very obviously wasn't. It was making me measurably better at the things that were "supposed" to matter.

I've thought about this experience a lot in the years since, and the research I've since encountered explains what was going on. Learning driven by genuine interest (the kind you do for no reason other than that you want to) engages your cognitive systems in ways that obligatory learning doesn't. It's not less serious. In many measurable ways, it's more effective. And it might be one of the most underrated learning strategies available to adults who have gradually convinced themselves that everything they learn needs to justify itself economically. Today's newsletter is about that. What the research shows about learning for pure interest, why it produces better outcomes than forced learning, and how to actually give yourself permission to do more of it. Let's get into it.

From our partners at Viktor:

QBR prep used to take a week. Now it lands in Slack Monday.

Your best CSMs block an hour before the strategic QBR. They pull NPS trends, dig through support history, check adoption deltas, draft the deck. The customer feels seen.

The other 190 QBRs this quarter don't get that hour. The CSM scans the dashboard five minutes before the call. The customer answers the same baseline questions again.

Viktor changes that ratio. Before any QBR, message Viktor. He pulls account health, open tickets, product usage, and recent company news. Drafts the brief. Attaches the deck. Posts it in your DMs before the day starts.

Every CSM walks into every QBR prepared. Even when there are 200 of them.

20,000+ teams. Connects to Gainsight, Zendesk, Salesforce, and 3,000+ other tools. SOC 2 certified.

The Research Is Genuinely Clear

Let me start with what the science actually shows, because the case for interest-driven learning is more solid than the popular conversation suggests.

The foundational research here comes from Mark Lepper and colleagues, working on what's called intrinsic motivation. According to their landmark work, a series of studies designed to test the hypothesis that making learning more fun will produce corresponding increases both in learning and retention and in subsequent interest in the subject matter itself, provided good general support for the hypothesized cognitive and motivational benefits of appropriately designed motivational embellishments of educational activities. Read that carefully. Not just "students enjoyed the fun version more." Learning and retention actually improved when the material engaged intrinsic motivation. Same content. Different motivational framing. Measurably different learning outcomes.

The mechanism is worth understanding. According to research on intrinsic motivation and academic outcomes, being intrinsically motivated to learn improves the quality of learning and that those conditions that are autonomy supporting and informational will promote more efficient learning as well as enhanced intrinsic motivation and self-esteem. Intrinsic motivation work and learning is one that is interesting, and these activities are performed by students to do for themselves to gain joy, satisfaction, and fun. The intrinsically motivated learner isn't just having a nicer time. They're actually processing information differently, retaining more, and building capability more efficiently than the extrinsically motivated learner covering the same material.

A more recent analysis of intrinsic motivation and cognitive outcomes made a similar point. According to the researchers, a higher level of intrinsic motivation could help people to be more willing to perform the work with effort while staying efficaciously, and the spontaneous tendency to seek out challenges and novelty, to explore and exercise one's capacity would potentially benefit students' academic outcomes. A high rate of intrinsic motivation could contribute to oneself being more willing to fulfill the work with efforts, to interact in intention putting tactics, and meticulously plan the work. The pattern keeps repeating. Interest-driven learning produces higher effort, better strategies, more sustained engagement, and better outcomes. It's not that intrinsic learners are cheating somehow. Their cognitive systems are literally operating better on material they care about than on material they don't.

Why Fun Learning Beats Forced Learning

Let me get into the mechanisms, because understanding why interest-driven learning works better tells you when it matters most.

Attention comes for free. When you're interested in something, you don't have to force yourself to focus on it. The attention is automatic. Compare this to trying to focus on material you find boring, where a substantial portion of your cognitive resources is spent just keeping yourself on task. Same task duration. Different cognitive load. The interest-driven learner has more resources available for the actual learning work.

Encoding is deeper. Material you're genuinely engaged with gets processed at a deeper level than material you're just trying to get through. This is the same phenomenon behind the dopamine research I covered in a previous newsletter… engagement produces the brain state that supports memory formation. Bored, obligated learning skips this. Enthusiastic, interested learning captures it.

Retention is longer. Because encoding is deeper, retention is better. The medieval history I learned during those eight months of obsession is still with me a decade later. The obligatory training modules I sat through during the same period? Almost none of it is retained. Same brain. Same year. Wildly different retention based on my motivational state during learning.

Connection-making is more active. When you're genuinely interested in something, your brain naturally makes more connections between the new material and what you already know. You look for how things relate. You notice patterns. You wonder about implications. This is elaboration (one of the most powerful learning strategies I've covered in previous newsletters) happening automatically, without effort. The bored learner has to force elaboration. The interested learner does it as a natural side effect of caring.

Sustained engagement is possible. Interest-driven projects can last years without burnout. Obligation-driven projects rarely can. This matters enormously because deep expertise requires sustained engagement over long periods. The learner who can sustain their engagement through the years-long process of building real skill has an advantage over the learner whose willpower runs out after three months.

The Case for "Useless" Learning

Here's the counterintuitive part I want to emphasize. The learning most likely to produce these benefits is the learning you have no external justification for. The hobby you'd pursue if nobody was watching. The subject you find yourself drawn to for no obvious reason. The topic that keeps pulling your attention even when you tell yourself you should be doing something more productive.

This category of learning gets systematically undervalued by adults who have absorbed the productivity mindset. If it doesn't advance a career, if it doesn't produce revenue, if it doesn't build a specific measurable skill… we tell ourselves it's not worth the time. This is, I now think, catastrophically wrong. It's the equivalent of dismissing the side quests in a game like Baldur's Gate 3 because they don't advance the main plot. Those side quests are where a huge amount of the actual character development happens. They're also where you have the most fun. The main plot is important. The side quests are what make the game.

Your "useless" learning projects are doing multiple things at once:

They preserve your capacity for interest itself. The muscle of being genuinely curious about things atrophies if you don't use it. Adults who never learn anything just for fun gradually lose the capacity to find things interesting. This isn't just a soft loss. It affects your ability to engage deeply with anything, including the "important" stuff.

They train the underlying learning machinery. Every hour spent in interest-driven learning is training the same cognitive systems you use for obligatory learning, but under conditions that support optimal engagement. The medieval history hours were making me a better learner across all domains, not just a better medieval history knower.

They build cognitive reserve. As I've covered in the neuroplasticity and lifelong learning newsletters, sustained cognitive engagement across life is one of the strongest predictors of cognitive health in aging. The person who maintains active interest-driven learning into their sixties and seventies has protection against decline that the person who stopped learning "for fun" decades earlier doesn't.

They produce unexpected connections. As I covered in the diverse relationships newsletter, exposure to different frameworks and vocabularies improves your thinking across domains. Interest-driven learning naturally exposes you to varied frameworks, which pays back in unexpected ways in your "important" work. My medieval history knowledge has produced insights in my professional work that I couldn't have anticipated when I was learning it.

They're what you'll remember. Twenty years from now, you'll remember the things you cared about. The certifications you grinded through for career reasons will mostly be gone. The subject you obsessively researched because you loved it will still be there. If you're going to invest years of your life in learning things, some of that learning might as well be things you'll actually retain.

The Distinction Worth Making

I want to be careful about a specific point. "Learning for fun" doesn't mean shallow learning or entertainment consumption. Scrolling through videos about a topic isn't the same as actually engaging with it. The kind of interest-driven learning I'm describing is genuinely rigorous… it involves reading substantial books, following complex arguments, sitting with difficult concepts. The fun is in the engagement, not in the ease.

The medieval history year I described wasn't casual TikTok viewing. It was 400-page academic histories, primary source translations, and podcasts by actual historians. The difficulty was real. What was different from obligatory learning was that I welcomed the difficulty because I cared about the material. When something was confusing, I dug in rather than bailing. When a book was long, I finished it rather than abandoning it. The interest didn't make the work easier. It made me willing to do harder work than I would have done for material I didn't care about.

This is what "learning for fun" actually looks like at its best. Real engagement with challenging material, sustained by genuine interest rather than external pressure. The Elden Ring approach… the difficulty is part of the appeal. You're not looking for easy content. You're looking for content worth the difficulty because you care about mastering it.

How to Actually Do This

Okay, the practical part. If you've been over-optimizing your learning toward instrumental goals and want to reclaim some space for interest-driven learning, here's how.

Give yourself explicit permission. This sounds soft but it matters. Many adults have absorbed such strong messages about productivity that they can't allow themselves to learn without justification. If this is you, the first move is to explicitly decide that some of your learning time is for interest only. Not everything has to justify itself. Some of it can just be for you.

Follow the strongest pull. When multiple topics interest you, pick the one that pulls hardest. Don't overthink it. The subject that keeps calling to you is the right one to pursue. The medieval history period started because I picked up one book on a whim. Follow the whim. See where it leads.

Commit real time, not just spare moments. Interest-driven learning gets treated as something you fit into gaps, which usually means it doesn't happen. Give it real, scheduled time. Not necessarily huge amounts (an hour a few times a week is plenty) but real committed time rather than "whenever I can."

Read substantive material. Skip the shallow entertainment version. Read the actual books. Listen to the actual expert podcasts. Follow the actual research. The depth is where the cognitive benefits live.

Let it wander. Interest-driven learning naturally follows connections. Follow them. If you started with medieval history and find yourself curious about the economic systems of the period, follow it into economic history. If that leads to interest in monetary theory, follow that. The wandering is the fun. It's also where the unexpected connections are made.

Don't feel obligated to produce anything. You don't have to write about what you're learning. You don't have to teach it. You don't have to justify it. You can just learn it for yourself. This is one of the freedoms that gets lost when everything becomes content or productivity fodder. Reclaim it.

Be patient with the utility question. People might ask what you're studying and why. You might not have a good answer. That's fine. "Because I find it interesting" is a complete answer even when it doesn't satisfy others. The utility often reveals itself years later in ways you couldn't have predicted.

Notice how it changes your general cognitive state. Pay attention to whether interest-driven learning periods correspond to improved focus, memory, and engagement across other domains. Most people who try this notice real effects within a few months. The data will help you take it seriously as a legitimate use of time.

The Bigger Lesson

Here's what I want you to take from all this. The framing of learning as something that should always justify itself economically is a modern invention that impoverishes both learning and the learner. Adults who maintain rich lives of interest-driven learning are cognitively better off than adults who don't, in ways that show up not just in the specific domains they're learning about but across their general cognitive functioning.

If you've been treating "useless" learning as an indulgence you can't afford, please reconsider. The research supports the opposite framing. Learning driven by genuine interest produces better outcomes than learning driven by obligation, and the compound effects across years are substantial. The person you'll be at 60 will be shaped partly by what you found interesting enough to pursue at 30, not just by what you were forced to learn for external reasons.

Reclaim some space for interest. Follow a subject you have no professional reason to care about. Let yourself find things fascinating without justification. In Stardew Valley, the most rewarding parts often aren't the required farming tasks but the side pursuits (the fishing, the museum donations, the relationships) that you choose because you want to. Same principle applies to your learning life. The main quests matter, but the game is much richer if you're also doing the things you're actually pulled toward.

Keep learning (and keep learning what you love),

Ray

Keep Reading